View Article  Question: I wonder if you can shed any light on prisms?
Kahlu speaks: Thanks for your question. Convergence is mostly mediated from the central nervous system, although there are probably ANS components. So when looking through base out prism, the brain’s centering center is activated. For the human aspect, they are asked: “How much can you stay centered within yourself without becoming disintegrated?” In Psychological terms, this means not becoming disassociated. Looking through Base out prism is a direct way of examining how well the person can move into the core centre of him or herself. How does this help? To center inwards is to enter a self-exploration of knowing one’s real self through observation. Hence my quote, with the mentoring of Ricardo Rojas!

“You can never know self! Self is the process of observing!”

We know from MRI and fMRI studies that those who meditate, and are emotionally calm inside themselves, have faster convergent and divergent abilities as measured with computer generated images.
Looking through Base in Prism directs the brain’s response to diverge. Mechanically this can be quantified in prism diopters, however, the evaluation on the human level asks how divergent can this person be in their view without entering duality, maybe even into a split personality, or some other form of mental perceptual distortion. To be divergent is to be flexible and non-rigid. Divergent perceptual abilities grant one the possibility to engage in conversations with less ego attachments, thus seeing many points of view.
Of course, the binocular view of life can be affected by the autonomic nervous system under emergency situations, but training with prisms is a much deeper and more far reaching process because of the direct access to the human mind via the CNS.
Combining prism Base out with minus lenses activates both nervous systems and thus explains why vision therapy is such a deeply effective process touching the very core of the human being. Thanks you, Kahlu.
View Article  Question: Would you please comment on minus lenses?
Kahlu answers: Thanks for your question. I love it. Minus lenses are heavily promoted because on the surface they give the illusion of 'correcting' a problem dictated by 'modern' eye medicine's insistence that nearsightedness is a structural eye problem. This narrow way of viewing lenses seems innocous.

Minus lenses are a drug. (You need a lens prescription to get them) Doctors know this. It is good for you to remember this. A minus lens is a sympathetic stimulant. Some of the actions resulting from this nervous system activation includes pupil dilation, increased heart rate, reduced intestinal motility, liver activation, and increased adrenal medulla secretion of norepinephrine and epinephrine.

Increase in pupil size is known to reduce visual acuity over time. Most eye doctors prescribe a minus lens for nearsightedness so the person's eyesight is returned to 20/20. However, research shows that in at least 80 percent of the time, the full minus lens prescription induces a disruption of the binocular integration. Superficially this may not seem like a monumental side effect.

On the other-hand, what happens to the human being who is over stimulated with a too strong minus lens prescription? If they are less binocular, they internally feel less integrated in their life. They see less into the depth of what it means to be human. They behave more mental and rely on thinking and looking through understanding. They over use logic to solve life problems, and feel less.

Is it possible that many of the problems you see in people and on our Earth these days come from this 'drugged' way of perceiving. When minus lenses are measured for maximum integration, the power is usually less. The lower minus lens prescription results in the person seeing and feeling more. Apparently, this happens because there is less foveal focus and more retinal stimulation.

In the long run, this 'lower minus lens' approach becomes useful for those who wish to undertake an active vision improvement approach. Kahlu.
View Article  Seeing Is More Than Just The Physical
Kahlu Speaks:

I have been quiet. Waiting for the right moment. There are human beings on Earth who are endowed with the ability to bring a broader view of reality and truth into the visible. Numerous people in the past have already participated. The great leaders of philosophy, science, religion, and spokespersons for peace have made enormous contributions.

It is time for a big step to be taken in the field of health care in particular eye and vision care. Why? Science has and continues to use a physical model to explain how the body and the eyes work. This is good. The progress in vision science has provided deep insights into how sight works. Is this enough? No. The way physical reality works on Earth is only one part of the total reality. Do you realize that what science has explained so far is less than 5 percent of the total known information of all existence in the universe.

This is like driving a 6-cylinder car with only 1 cylinder working. The car operates but not efficiently. There is a branch of Optometry known as behavioural Optometry, a growing profession that has evolved out of vision therapy. However, these fine individuals are struggling to be seen and heard. Much of their emphasis is on vision and its relationship to learning.

This is a very needed application. Behavioural vision must also be connection to adults. It is the parents of the children that need the new vision. They are the ones making the decisions now and must have the full capacity to see to effectively guide the next generation, our children. How can the principles of behavioural vision be combined with a new paradigm of understanding how vision actually works?

This will require stepping beyond the current way we explain seeing function than just the physical. The information already exists on Earth. What it will take is for this information to be decoded and presented into a form that more people will understand. I am Kahlu. I am guiding this process. Pay attention.